I owned my Calc II Recitation survey.
Students gave me 3.45 for clarity, 3.21 for helpfulness, 1.65 for ease, and 3.80 for overall quality. Yay me!
>_>
<_<
x__x
Oh well, I think that's equivalent to a C or something. Maybe C-. Or a D+. :D
Well, the comments were wonderful. Here's what my students (ananymously) had to say about TA Jack:
"Tells stupid jokes at the beginning of each class. Thinks he's funny and everyone likes him, but the opposite is true."
"Jack is the greatest man ever. His recitations are 75 minutes of non-stop hilarity and they're the only ones I bother to show up to. He can't teach though."
"Either incredibly brilliant or incredibly stupid, depending on the time of day and the topic at hand. Nobody can read what he writes on the board because of his handwriting, but if you ask him after class to explain something he will gladly do so."
"TA typifies confused and disorganized scientist stereotype. Focuses on theory rather than practicality. Recitations are spent deriving equations instead of learning how to apply them, despite that we are tested on practical applications, making recitations basically useless. Thankfully, attendence isn't mandatory so I just stopped showing up."
"Jack is a prodigy, literally a rocket scientist. He's better than Kleeman (the professor for whom I worked), so I just stopped going to lectures, focusing on recitations only. He pretty much ignores the textbook and teaches straight from his mind, which is a welcome change. Non-math majors might have trouble keeping up with him, though."
I know who wrote the first and last ones :P
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Oh yeah, and the numbers given at the beginning were out of 5.
Oh man. I wish I could have been in this class.
I guess it's true, people either love you or they hate you.
They all love me. The ones who say they don't are delusional :P
Post a Comment